The End of the 28-year old Bush-Clinton Era
When President Ronald chose George Bush as his running mate,
he probably did not predict that an era of historic economic politics had
started. As a notorious President, Reagan envisioned an America strong at home
and overseas, but founded on the basis of a true democracy. Reagan was also a successful visionary on
immigration issues reaching an important reform. Reagan's only blemish came
from the CIA of his time. With Bush being closer to the Central Intelligence
Agency than the President, the CIA was accused on money laundering with the only
goal to fund the Nicaraguan rebels in their efforts to oust President Somoza.
Finally, the Sandinists lead by today's President Daniel Ortega succeeded, and
upon returning he maintains an aggressive and expansionist politics trying to
take waters from Colombia and land from Costa Rica. Ortega may have benefited from his
connection to the CIA and from the Post-Soviet Finlandization of The Hague,
which probably supports a Nicaraguan-Cuban pathway on the Caribbean.
Reagan-Bush's CIA conspired against its own AML principles,
which collided with those of the DEA, giving the beginning of a new era a
significant blemish, which forced the next Bush's government to show off another perspective while ousting General Noriega of Panama, and starting what was
believed to be the successful Desert Storm war against Sadam Hussein. But the
key issue is that the Bush era failed to bring prosperity to the USA on a
limited democracy, I mean one heavily controlled by a military vision, in which
Vice President Cheney played an important role through three terms.
The Clintons, both Bill and Hillary, had a dubious role in the White Water land case, where they were the only ones never prosecuted, among those involved.
The Clintons, both Bill and Hillary, had a dubious role in the White Water land case, where they were the only ones never prosecuted, among those involved.
Today democracy is tired of a 28-year era, which Americans
see as a controlled democracy, but which is perceived as a regime from
overseas, in a similar way as Americans have perceived dictatorships in the Middle
East and Africa. Indeed, everyone knows that a Hillary Clinton government would represent
a third term for her husband and the extension of an era that has put Americans
on their knees economically and financially.
This means the return of underage White House Interns like Monica Lewinsky,
and the return of Clinton's romantic affairs, scandals that are pleasant some in
the Democrat Party, which they see under the lemma of "This is
America", i.e., this is America's moral in the White House. I believe that President Obama is just the
cushioning of the era, not to make it so obvious to call it a regime from
overseas. Let us remember that Obama took lead over Clinton after an incident
where the two campaigns collided on the road, and one of Clinton's bodyguard
was fatally injured.
As such, after all, the USA starts resembling some
monarchies where the father, the son, the grandson must be named king; or
otherwise, the mother take that honor in the lack of a child available for that
goal. In a country filled with many highly capable businessmen and renowned
economists, and also many bright women, the dollars have to be managed on the
overwhelming control of military expenditure, the F-35 being the most current
investment of this nature. This is certainly not a requirement in the eyes of
democracy or a need in the vision of Reagan or any other US President focused
on national security.
Former British Prime Minister Tony Blair's admission that
invading Irak was a mistake — for which he issued an apology — suggests that
President George W. Bush acted "on his gut" rather than waiting from
a Congressional consensus and support, but he has been blessed for doing so.
With Hillary Clinton as President Obamas's Secretary of State, the completion
of the Middle East jamming was "purposely completed", according to an
unofficial threatening and bullying Democratic source, who called her the
potential "Push-Button Lady", target for which she had started that Middle East
diplomatic mess.
With all these historic economic politics events in the mind
of the average American, I would expect that the American people use a reasonable
common sense to put an end to this era.
While Donald Trump has certainly used an aggressive
language, many of the things that he has said on illegal Mexican immigrants,
Iowan, and Muslims I had already heard from many other Americans a few times,
so he is not the first person to make those comments. As a man of Hispanic origin, I would prefer
that someone is honest in his viewpoints, even if they might sound offensive to
me, rather than having some people stabbing me in the back, which I could find
condemnable. It is my opinion that Trump is the best candidate for the American economy with
a great economic vision, and he needs to synergize with others. But - on the other hand - the
apparent negative of the Bushes to support him, as well as the creation of the
"Never Trump" movement just indicates the imperative of the need of
the beneficiaries of the 28-year old area to extend it. It also gives the
Bushes the narrow-minded anti-democratic viewpoint that parties must be lead
and controlled by dynasties and family hierarchies, a principle that I
religiously detest for being so close to a dictatorship. Surprisingly, other millionaires
like Mitt Romney do not see him positively; while Bloomberg, a successful
Democratic major with a Republican vision had made bitter comments about him. This is probably because they ignore that the
Republican Party is not the party of millionaires but rather the party that
attracts people of conservative views, and every especially, the young people,
the recent graduates; those who have dissimilar perspectives on the CIA: some
seeing it as their dream workplace; others, as an agency to be banned; others
indifferent, not caring for it due to their economic politics history.
I do support Donald Trump in his ideal to bring an immigration
law that enhances the ethical values of immigrants, and his expectations on
such a higher morality, without detriment of their living standards and human
dignity. This is important for legal Hispanic immigrants because the most
common crime committed by illegal immigrants is identity theft, which they
usually need to get a job, establish a business, or start and maintain formal
relationships. Donald Trump should compromise to improve the lives of those he
had depicted as outcast.
